本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛谢谢你的建议，很好。很高兴有网友花时间读了。这个故事是在两人交谈中产生的，开始就是从口语的角度落笔的，以“讲”达到“懂”的目的，遣词造句极可能不周。我的回答如下：
我的回答如下：
1- didn't have time & had little time 我用前者，本意是想要强调父母时间少，无法分配时间给孩子。你的建议也不错。
2- They were too busy with their work and business. 文章的意思是父母一个在科里，一个有自己的生意—（本文无意谈论父母的工作）
3- -----After she was 4-year-old, she started to stay in the kindergarten all the time
=》turned 4 year old 好，更常用。
=》stay in the kindergarten all the time – 中国式的全托，我们小时候的流行，周日回家。这可能和这里的kindergarten 不同。这点我很同意你说的“说法不地道”。 你改的 “she was sent to a boarding kindergarten” is much better,
4- she wanted her parents to focus their valuable time on their work and family,
（你的意见：５岁的孩子觉悟这么高？还能want父母focus on 工作？当然你写的是你自己，你觉得是就是。我的看法这个表述不准确。）
回答：半开玩笑也是实话，如果你有一个4-year-old的孩子，就知道她会记住父母的每一句话，而且喜欢当成自己的意见重复 。这句确实要改，我本意其实想说： --She wanted her parents to focus their valuable time on their work and leisure.
-Making trouble for her parents 好！
5. take care of her V.S. care for her 我用前者，因为 take care 有 watch over 和 be responsible for的意思，更适用在小孩身上；care for -似乎更强调意愿，偏好？
再次感谢您的宝贵时间和回帖。更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
我的回答如下：
1- didn't have time & had little time 我用前者，本意是想要强调父母时间少，无法分配时间给孩子。你的建议也不错。
2- They were too busy with their work and business. 文章的意思是父母一个在科里，一个有自己的生意—（本文无意谈论父母的工作）
3- -----After she was 4-year-old, she started to stay in the kindergarten all the time
=》turned 4 year old 好，更常用。
=》stay in the kindergarten all the time – 中国式的全托，我们小时候的流行，周日回家。这可能和这里的kindergarten 不同。这点我很同意你说的“说法不地道”。 你改的 “she was sent to a boarding kindergarten” is much better,
4- she wanted her parents to focus their valuable time on their work and family,
（你的意见：５岁的孩子觉悟这么高？还能want父母focus on 工作？当然你写的是你自己，你觉得是就是。我的看法这个表述不准确。）
回答：半开玩笑也是实话，如果你有一个4-year-old的孩子，就知道她会记住父母的每一句话，而且喜欢当成自己的意见重复 。这句确实要改，我本意其实想说： --She wanted her parents to focus their valuable time on their work and leisure.
-Making trouble for her parents 好！
5. take care of her V.S. care for her 我用前者，因为 take care 有 watch over 和 be responsible for的意思，更适用在小孩身上；care for -似乎更强调意愿，偏好？
再次感谢您的宝贵时间和回帖。更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net