×

Loading...

Topic

This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
  • 枫下家园 / 望子成龙 / 接到TDSB通知说要准备取消Gifted,Arts and IB program。听取意见到11月20日, +1
    http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Community/How-to-Get-Involved/Enhancing-Equity-Task-Force/Enhancing-Equity-Task-Force-Recommendations

    接到TDSB通知说要准备取消Gifted,Arts and IB program。听取意见到11月20日,就是下周一。想表达意见要求不取消,但怕英语不够好,不知道怎么写。想请问有家长写过意见的,可以借鉴一下吗?或者说说怎么写吗?
    • 他们提出的理由是要平权。文件在这里。
    • 看了他们的文件,说是这些Program有种族歧视的成分,怎么觉得是要准备象美国实行AA一样的前奏呢?
      本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛It was also noted that programs such as the Gifted and Home School programs and practices such as streaming are deepening divisions along socio-economic and racial lines, and contributing to the deficit mentality towards certain students, especially Indigenous and Black students, that educators, administrators, and even fellow classmates may hold



      Bias and Discrimination

      Racism
      Racism was frequently raised as a concern by a very wide variety of stakeholders, notably by families and students. Explicit and implicit forms of racism were reported, expressed in both subtle and strong ways. Stories ranged from a teacher making a casual jokes about lynching to a teacher allowing racist comments to be said in the classroom and telling the class that everyone is entitled to their opinions. The Task Force found that when educators do not address unacceptable occurrences in their classrooms appropriately, harmful perspectives and behaviours are legitimized and perpetuated at the expense of other students.

      Participants further reported how bias and discrimination affect decision-making for students, due to a deficit mindset held by some staff. As noted earlier, streaming was raised many times as an example of this pattern, as assumptions are made about students from certain races and backgrounds. These experiences were supported by research (James & Turner,2017; Queiser & De Araujo, 2017). Students shared how this impacted their well-being and morale in negative ways. Specific attention was drawn to anti-Indigenous and anti-Black racism, and recent reports examining the relationship between race, achievement, and well-being were cited supporting peoples’ stories and lived experiences. The Student Resource Officer (SRO) program was also frequently raised as an example of perceived criminalization of racialized youth, due to the over-representation of SROs in more racialized schools. Many of these related concerns were reflected in the recommendations shared with the Task Force by the Black Student Achievement Advisory Committee (see Appendix C).

      Islamophobia

      Participants felt that the Board is not doing enough to address the problem of rising Islamophobia and the negative impact this has on Muslim students. Participants reported instances of school staff planning school events without taking into account of religious holidays that affect Muslim students. Some students and parents/caregivers expressed frustration at having to explain and advocate for their need for religious accommodation.

      Biased Curriculum and Materials

      Participants raised the issue of bias in the curriculum and textbooks, noting in particular the Eurocentric orientation of both. Many felt that students often struggle to see themselves represented in schools. It was felt that de-centering this Eurocentric curriculum and providing more training for teachers in culturally relevant and responsive pedagogy is needed.

      Biased Teachers and Staff

      Some participants spoke out about experiencing prejudice from school staff, particularly on the basis of their socio-economic or racial background. They stressed that it is the duty of the Board to ensure that staff do not perpetuate such prejudices. It is felt that Board staff need to self-reflect and challenge their own biases. Participants were clear that it is necessary to hold challenging conversations about racism, oppression, privilege, classism and other barriers to equity. People also felt that partnering with faculties of education and unions to ensure teacher training is culturally reflective and diverse would help reduce the bias educators hold.更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
    • 狼真的来了?
      • 听取意见到11月20日,就是下周一。想表达意见要求不取消,但怕英语不够好,不知道怎么写。想请问有家长写过意见的,可以借鉴一下吗?或者说说怎么写吗?
    • Claude Watson的info night上校长说不会被取消? +1
      • 请问他们怎么说的呢?那他们怎么解释这个文件的事情呢?
        • because of the earlier objections from parents of arts specialty schools, TDSB withdraw the proposal of canceling the specialty schools, instead, they now propose to cancel the specialty programs which gifted program is part of it.
          • 哦,这么说,他们想逐个击破。挑软的。Art 影响广泛,反抗太大,就单挑GP。因为里面的大多是华人孩子,反抗的声音很小的话,也没有得到其实人的支持,就很容易对付了。
            • 华人是软柿子?gifted 家长应该发声吧?
    • Here's a letter from our school parents' council
      本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛>
      >
      > From Eleanor Stainsby
      >
      >
      >
      > I'm reaching out to you as the parent council leads for your school. I'm hoping that you will circulate the note below urging parents to take action and make their voices heard regarding the Enhancing Equity Task Force Recommendations relevant to the Gifted Program.
      >
      >
      >
      > SUBJECT: URGENT: We need your help to save the Gifted program!
      >
      >
      >
      > The Toronto District School Board recently released the draft Enhancing Equity Task Force report.
      >
      >
      >
      > The report includes recommendations to “reform” (dismantle) the Gifted Program by placing and integrating gifted students into regular classes.
      >
      >
      >
      > The report initially called for phasing out specialized schools, such as a school for the Arts. Parents were also concerned that specialized programs such as TOPS or International Baccalaureate would be cancelled. After a massive outcry from the students and parents in these programs, Director of Education John Malloy back-pedaled and said these programs won't be affected. This shows that students and parents can have an impact!! Unfortunately, the Gifted program is not protected by Malloy’s recent reprieve.
      >
      >
      >
      > The report’s recommendation to integrate gifted students into a regular classroom is not supported by the research. Policy changes should be supported by evidence-based decision making and the research consistently shows that grouping gifted students benefits both gifted and non-gifted students.
      >
      >
      >
      > We wholeheartedly oppose the draft Enhancing Equity Task Force recommendations to dismantle the Gifted Program by integrating gifted students into regular classes. We need your help to protect the Gifted Program!
      >
      >
      >
      > What you can do:
      >
      > • Provide your feedback here before November 20 (OPTIONAL SURVEY RESPONSE BELOW)
      >
      > https://surveys.tdsb.on.ca/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=542812&newtest=Y
      >
      > • Email the TDSB Trustees & Director of Education, John Malloy (OPTIONAL EMAIL RESPONSE & full Trustee list below). They each get a vote on accepting this Report and its recommendations. The more people they hear from the more impact the messages will have (cut and paste list below, online list: http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Leadership/Trustees)
      >
      > • Read the Report summary http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Portals/0/Community/docs/EETFSummaryandRecommendations.pdf
      >
      > • Read the full Report http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Portals/0/Community/docs/EETFReport.pdf
      >
      > • Read this article from the Star: https://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2017/10/24/someone-has-to-stand-upfor-the-gifted-students-mallick.html
      >
      > • Read this article from The Conversation about why gifted students should go to a separate school:
      >
      > http://theconversation.com/should-gifted-students-go-to-a-separate-school-71620
      >
      > • SHARE, SHARE, SHARE! Help us get the word out to anyone this Report may affect.
      >
      >
      >
      > TDSB Trustees & Director Contact List – Cut and Paste Format
      >
      > Avtar.Minhas@tdsb.on.ca, chris.glover@tdsb.on.ca, pamela.gough@tdsb.on.ca, Tiffany.Ford@tdsb.on.ca, Alexandra.Lulka@tdsb.on.ca, chris.tonks@tdsb.on.ca, Robin.Pilkey@tdsb.on.ca, Jennifer.Arp@tdsb.on.ca, Marit.Stiles@tdsb.on.ca, Ausma.Malik@tdsb.on.ca, shelley.laskin@tdsb.on.ca, Alexander.Brown@tdsb.on.ca, gerri.gershon@tdsb.on.ca, Chris.Moise@tdsb.on.ca, Jennifer.Story@tdsb.on.ca, sheila.cary-meagher@tdsb.on.ca, Ken.Lister@tdsb.on.ca, Parthi.Kandavel@tdsb.on.ca, david.smith4@tdsb.on.ca, Manna.Wong@tdsb.on.ca, abdul.patel@tdsb.on.ca, jerry.chadwick@tdsb.on.ca, rakeeb.hossain@tdsb.on.ca, shams.mehdi@tdsb.on.ca; john.malloy@tdsb.on.ca
      >
      >
      >
      > OPTIONAL EMAIL/SURVEY RESPONSE
      >
      > If you don’t have time to write an original email or survey response, here’s something you can cut and paste. Ideally, add some info about your child’s success with the gifted program or challenges he or she faced in the regular classroom:
      >
      >
      >
      > I wholeheartedly oppose the draft Enhancing Equity Task Force recommendations to dismantle the Gifted Program by integrating gifted students into regular classes. I demand that recommendations to reform the gifted program are removed from the Enhancing Equity Task Force Report.
      >
      > Research at both the national and international level has long advocated that students who are gifted have specific learning needs that require:
      >
      > - tailored learning strategies
      >
      > - education supported by a challenging curriculum
      >
      > - teachers trained in gifted education
      >
      > - more exposure to students of similar ability
      >
      > - opportunities for acceleration
      >
      > Failing to provide an appropriate education for students who are gifted increases the risk of mental health issues, boredom, frustration, developing behavioural problems both at school and at home, leading to disengagement and dropping out of school.
      >
      >
      >
      > <INSERT YOUR CHILD’S SUCCESS IN THE GIFTED PROGRAM/CHALLENGES WITH THE REGULAR PROGRAM HERE>
      >
      >
      >
      > Equity is not enhanced by integrating gifted students into regular classes. I demand that recommendations to reform the gifted program are removed from the Enhancing Equity Task Force Report.更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
      • 谢谢。会参考这个模板写信反对。的确如信中所说,取消GP,把G与其他学生一起上课,其实对双方都有负面影响。
        • 并不是说G更加聪明,研究表明,是基于两者的学习模式天生的就不同。老师的精力有限,应对学习模式分歧很大的学生会令他们更疲于奔命,到头来,无论G还是非G,都没有得到应该有的指导和教育。 +1
        • Here's the reply i got from TDSB after sending out the letter. I would encourage concerned parents to send them the email. It really doesn't make sense to cancel GP as it doesn't occupy any extra resource from the board.
          本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛On behalf of the Board, thank you for contacting us.

          The Enhancing Equity Task Force will present their recommendations, based on the work they have done (which has included many community meetings, focus groups, surveys, as well as analysis on equity research) for the last year to the Board at the December meeting. These recommendations are not finalized, people still have the ability to respond via a survey until November 20, however in their present form, they are high level and could not be operationalized as they stand now. Based on that, my belief is that trustees will receive the report and send it back to staff for recommendations on how they could be implemented and what the effects would be. At that point trustees would be in a better position to decide on how the results of this work could move forward. This would come in January through a Board committee, where the public can delegate on those recommendations. After that it would go to the full Board in early February for a final vote.



          I anticipate that staff will come back and say some recommendations cannot be implemented as they stand now and will likely provide suggestions on how the equity goals could be met in another way. They would also present additional context that the task force would not have had access to as that group was focussed on big ideas and not the 'nuts and bolts' of implementing their recommendations. Trustees are obviously concerned with both.

          Classes for students with gifted exceptionalities are special education programs. There is no intention to discontinue congregated classes, if the student needs cannot be met in a regular classroom. This is for students with all exceptionalities. However, there are situations where students with exceptionalities are shunted out of classrooms, for whatever reasons, when with some differentiated learning, they could remain in a regular class and that is one of the issues the task force is trying to address. The Board recognizes that students have different needs and in order to help them achieve, we need to have a variety of options.



          A link to the draft report is here:



          http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Community/How-to-Get-Involved/Enhancing-Equity-Task-Force/Enhancing-Equity-Task-Force-Recommendations



          Students, staff, parents and community members have the opportunity to responded directly to the Task Force, until November 20. I would urge you to make your concerns known to them directly so that your concerns may be reflected in the final report.



          https://surveys.tdsb.on.ca/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=542812&newtest=Y



          As well, I am not sure you saw the article in the Star, with the Director's interview, but it may address some of your concerns as well.



          https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2017/10/23/goal-of-equity-report-is-high-expectations-all-students-being-served-says-tdsbs-john-malloy.html



          Again, thank you for contacting us.

          Regards,

          Robin Pilkey

          Chair更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
          • 谢谢,会写信去反对的。目前看来,似乎只是针对TDSB,但如果他们可以成功取消的话,其他地区教育局说不定也会相应效仿的。最终就向美丽新世界的AA大道走去。
      • 所谓的公平,其实才是不公平。很怀疑加拿大是不是想沿着美国的No Child Left Behind, Common Core, AA 一路走下去。
    • 啥逻辑,大学也有好多孩子考不上的,干脆也关了,都没学上就平等了
    • 如果取消 gp 能开放跳级那也是可代替方案. +1
      凭能力分班,而非年纪
      • 害子无止境。。。 +4
        • 研究显示跳级对大多数资优生人格发展与社交方面更有助益
          • 研究显示,
            1)你的孩子年龄很小,2)这是你第一个孩子,照着书养呢。 哈哈 没说错吧
            • 都不是。其实 gp , 中文学校, 许多的 afterschool program 都是多年纪混班。家里兄弟姐妹也是不同年纪一起玩。 没有负面影响,只让同岁的小孩在一起玩才是不自然的
              • 这里不是在讨论要不要混班的问题。是要不要因材施教的问题。
                • 要因材施教,而非因年纪施教. +1
                  当然有一些 twice exceptional 学生需要特殊教育
      • 这是不可行的。你的IQ到了,不代表你的EQ到了。跳对孩子恐怕是弊大于利的。 +1
    • 不是这些program让孩子变得更强,而是厉害的孩子都集中到这些program来,取消与否,厉害的孩子还是厉害。 +4
      • GP program 对GP孩子的社交帮助远远大于学业帮助。当初设立时候的初衷目的,文件里都是怎么描述来着? 现在倒没人提了? +1
    • 要获得平等的权利不是通过剥夺他人权利,使之拉低到同一水平,而应该给弱势争取同等权利,提高整体水平,获得共同进步。正如民主的进步不是靠剥夺贵族选举权,而是赋予妇女和平民同等选举权。所以要提倡教育平等,应该着力于提高普通班级的教学水平与质量
    • 取消了也无不可,跟其他孩子一起更可以用成绩虐他们。