When North America became warm, they said it was due to global warming; now it's still the same cause? :)
-sailor(Ocean & Mountain);
2018-1-5(#11271825@0)+1
Now North America gets such a "Bomb cyclone". Does it bring down the global average temperature? Actually the formula to work out the so-called "global temperature" is a tricky part.
-sailor(Ocean & Mountain);
2018-1-5(#11272466@0)
别这么无知，这些内容都在10年级的教科书里，实在看不懂我可以教你。
-light_and_shadow(lost to time);
2018-1-5(#11271977@0)+5
It's debatable...does "polar vortex weakening" make sense to you?
-whynot108(练修养的牛);
2018-1-5(#11272292@0)
Climate is always changing. For sure there is a reason for "polar vortex weakening". However, this article uses a not-so-scientific way to claim the following:
-sailor(Ocean & Mountain);
2018-1-5{297}(#11272361@0)
"It seems like it’s linked to sea ice loss in the Barents and Kara seas—the melting of which is, of course, due to human induced global warming."
简单地讲，北极气温上升，冷空气边缘化，南移影响北美大陆。
-light_and_shadow(lost to time);
2018-1-5(#11271973@0)+4
Since the late 1970s, the Arctic has lost an average of 20,800 square miles (53,900 square kilometers) of ice a year; the Antarctic has gained an average of 7,300 square miles (18,900 sq km).
-weichen2005(吃瓜派掌门);
2018-1-5(#11272346@0)
That's about the size of areas. But how about the volume? How thick is the ice layers gained/lost in either pole?
-sailor(Ocean & Mountain);
2018-1-5(#11272421@0)
The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice.
-weichen2005(吃瓜派掌门);
2018-1-5(#11272459@0)+1
NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses
-weichen2005(吃瓜派掌门);
2018-1-5(#11272463@0)+1
海冰融化没错，气候变暖没错，海冰范围扩大不能否决这一点。范围不等于南极海冰总量更不等于南极冰总量。
-light_and_shadow(lost to time);
2018-1-5(#11272373@0)