The result is decades of sorrow for mainland Chinese people.
-dennis2(Dennis);
2002-2-26(#381417@0)
那上帝可太不懂事了.不信奉他的是"老人家",可不该迁怒mainland Chinese people:D
-rainrain(雨雨);
2002-2-26(#381429@0)
Yin1 Guo3 (or karma in English? Sorry no Chinese input at work) is a very complicated thing that we as human being cannot understand with our very limited wisdom.
-dennis2(Dennis);
2002-2-26{95}(#381444@0)
God does not get angry and punish people, bad karma does. Mao must have believed he is the God.
"如果造物主真的存在，而你因不知他的能力和对你的影响而不信奉，那是因为你的目光短浅，最终受了灾难还不知道为什么。" -- Totally agree with you.
-dennis2(Dennis);
2002-2-26(#381454@0)
You are very wrong in that you think God is just like any other ordinary people like you and me and does things according to ordinary people's will. Let me tell you this: you cannot even imagin how deep God's love is.
-dennis2(Dennis);
2002-2-27(#382877@0)
关键是你相信造物主存在(自己信也好，别人洗脑也罢)，自古人们对传奇人物、伟人、有人格魅力的人都会向往、崇拜，虽然这些人、事与你的关系远不如你父母那么密切。但如果有一个能将宇宙都玩弄于指掌之间的东东(实在不知该称上帝为人、物、东西、或玩意儿？)存在，古今枭雄、天地万物都为之失色(当然，according to 圣经描述的神奇法力)，你还有什么理由、有什么怀疑不对他顶礼模拜？如果你曾崇拜过某个作家、学者、艺术家、军事家、总统... 的话。如果天塌下来你也不会为谁眨眼，谁也不在你眼中，另一码事。崇拜上帝与爱你父母一样，是绝对要发自内心的，没人逼你绝对服从，永远用谦卑的口气说话，你可不信，也可信了又不信，后来又信，再后来。。。
Solid things,substantial things, no abstract, no imagination.
-dayafterday(我只想唱那首老情歌);
2002-3-13(#401545@0)
That's only what you see through your bare eye. Solid or not, that's just human feelings. If you go into atom level, there's no solid thing.
-dennis2(Dennis);
2002-3-13(#401550@0)
By saying solid, i donot only mean the state of an object.
-dayafterday(我只想唱那首老情歌);
2002-3-13(#401558@0)
Then what do you mean by saying solid?
-dennis2(Dennis);
2002-3-13(#401562@0)
Do u think solid things only refer to objects with solid state ?
-dayafterday(我只想唱那首老情歌);
2002-3-14(#402613@0)
You didn't answer my question.
-dennis2(Dennis);
2002-3-14(#402752@0)
what is "物质", pls check my first definition. I am not a physicist, if my answer can't satisfy u, check through the net.
-dayafterday(我只想唱那首老情歌);
2002-3-14(#402913@0)
So are you saying you don't really know what solid things are, which means your fact is based on something you don't really know?
-dennis2(Dennis);
2002-3-14(#402984@0)
That my answer(definition) can not satisfy u does not mean my answer is not correct, of course does not mean my statement is built on sth i am not sure either.
-dayafterday(我只想唱那首老情歌);
2002-3-14(#403020@0)