Unfortunately that is a fact of life. People prefer information faster, even not perfect. If you want good quality information, you need to wait for at least one month. Then a lot of people will start complaining.
-jeffrey815(Smartiecat);
2013-2-6(#8042990@0)
I don't think so. In the Feb 2012 report, last page, the Jan figure was revised downward to 4472 already. In the mar report, it is further revised down to 4449, etc. You don't need to wait for one year.
-jeffrey815(Smartiecat);
2013-2-6{195}(#8043014@0)
My point is you need to understand why the variance is coming from, rather than just accusing someone lying.
I attached in the link the Feb/Mar report. The figure I quoted is in the last page.
Most people will not want to wait till March/April to see the number in January. If that is your choice, you could wait untill March/April and do the comparison for January.
-jeffrey815(Smartiecat);
2013-2-6(#8043034@0)
Because the sales which did not close is mostly the more expensive houses because it is harder to get financing? Is this hard to interpret?
-jeffrey815(Smartiecat);
2013-2-7(#8044034@0)
你的意思是富人借不到钱,穷人借得到。是吧?LOL, you made my day!
-guojie(guojie);
2013-2-7(#8044592@0)
That is a way to do it. But do you trust your gut feeling that the 10% is right? Or do you trust the currently available data? It is just a methodology. As a reader you just need to understand that methodology.
-jeffrey815(Smartiecat);
2013-2-7(#8044040@0)