This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
事业与工作 / 合同工的黄金时代已到尽头:你的bug, 你赔偿 This is the Beginning of Ending the Golden Age for I.T. Contractors – You Will Be Liable for the Bugs in Your Code -- IT
-wukongjj(不经历风雨怎么见彩虹);
2010-7-7
{1850}
(#6163947@0)
-
Typical bullshit from politicians. I don't think it's enforceable at all -- everyone knows any software bug is typically a result of "collective efforts".:-)
-cca(不归的如来佛);
2010-7-7
(#6163982@0)
-
Unless they are talking about out-sourcing style subcontracts -- but that's totally different from what most "IT contractors" are doing, including the guy who crashed into the IRS building. In that case, it may be doable -- but then again,the fee-schedule for that category is at a totally different scale.
-cca(不归的如来佛);
2010-7-7
{67}
(#6163987@0)
-
Just as the 'bug' of the prospected legislation, there is no single software developer in the world dare to claim: " I never make bug in my code" or " my code is unbreakable".If the politician does not know this fact, he cannot be accountable for his bill, why should software developer should be?
Most of the time, security breaches are caused by a smarter attacker rather than a bug. If you ask a software developer to be accountable for every breach, just like asking a player being accountable for every losing game. Nobody will play the game at the end.
-eggplant(老茄子);
2010-7-7
{387}
(#6164593@0)
-
這樣好了,金融危機都可以追究里根,老布什,克林頓,小布什的責任了!
-yesiam(party time);
2010-7-7
(#6164628@0)
-
No, 不需要。他们不是专业人士,没有 license number.
-wukongjj(不经历风雨怎么见彩虹);
2010-7-7
(#6164878@0)
-
哪个IT developer 有license number?
-guanshui88(约定);
2010-7-7
(#6164940@0)
-
If what's discussed here would become law one day, the developers would be licensed.
-wukongjj(不经历风雨怎么见彩虹);
2010-7-7
(#6164976@0)
-
If it is true, which I doubt, it is really a good news, no, it is a great news to contractor.
That means the contractor's pay rate will go up due to the increase of risk.
-laominzi(老民子);
2010-7-7
(#6164650@0)
-
That's right!
-cca(不归的如来佛);
2010-7-7
(#6164674@0)
-
One of rules of capitalism is: The one who takes more risk makes money.
The one who escapes from the risk pays the money.
-laominzi(老民子);
2010-7-7
(#6164709@0)
-
interesting.. i wish so and want to see how it's implemented, if it's do-able, it's a sign of the beginning of a revolution like culture revolution in China.
-askquestions123(askquestions123);
2010-7-7
(#6164715@0)
-
The golder age of IT contractors start now! The rate will be 100 times more and the quality will be , eh 50 time more. Work for two years and retire! Freedom 35!!! WOW!!!!!
-amsteel(㊣沙龙猪);
2010-7-7
(#6164771@0)
-
Start the I.T. work @32? To..............oooo late.Work for two years and retire! Freedom 25!!! WOW!!!!!
-wukongjj(不经历风雨怎么见彩虹);
2010-7-7
{105}
(#6164884@0)
-
One of the proposals would be to categorize if the bug is an intentional one, or accidental. Physicians, surgeons...have similar organization which after an accident occurs will intervene to made a judgment.
-wukongjj(不经历风雨怎么见彩虹);
2010-7-7
(#6164784@0)
-
theoritically all bugs root from human neglegence.
-askquestions123(askquestions123);
2010-7-7
(#6164829@0)
-
Agree, just like errors made by doctors. Doctors typically have the insurance cover their mistakes. IT guys ....soon will have to buy the insurance?
-wukongjj(不经历风雨怎么见彩虹);
2010-7-7
(#6164868@0)
-
其实给飞机火箭写飞行控制软件的PROGRAMMER压力就挺大,在中国军工系统,严重的BUG ,至少是记过.
-tomcattomcat(tomy);
2010-7-7
(#6164915@0)
-
觉得就是祖国的制度好。偶真的BS北美那种片面强调Team Spirit, 出了bug不去找原因,真正的原因。最后结果是,写code的没功劳,倒是修bug 的有功劳。bug越大,功劳越大。
-wukongjj(不经历风雨怎么见彩虹);
2010-7-7
(#6164972@0)
-
啊?有这种可能吗?嘻嘻,幸好俺年初开始不做contractor了。
-james05(关不上的窗);
2010-7-7
(#6165061@0)
-
任何一个工程师都买保险吧?买了保险不就万事大吉了吗?
-111111(快乐老家);
2010-7-7
(#6165293@0)
-
oops, I did not buy insurance for my work since I came to Canada.
-laominzi(老民子);
2010-7-8
(#6165608@0)
-
很多美国的合同工要求买保险
-yesiam(party time);
2010-7-8
(#6166029@0)
-
拉倒吧,一看就是外行,通常tester要对bug负责,尤其是真正的软件公司,而不是programmer.
-informix();
2010-7-8
(#6165948@0)
-
未必。建筑行业也有监管的,呵呵。但是出了问题是总设计师和总工程师去坐牢。
-james05(关不上的窗);
2010-7-8
(#6166101@0)
-
监管不是测试。
-informix();
2010-7-8
(#6166137@0)