In the real-time life, people always have different opinions in some disputable things. This is in particular the case in the world of methodologists. In such a case, we should raise our thumb if somebody's opinion is self-contained and he/she can defend for him/herself.
As far as the question I raised here, I
think your explanation is self-consistent.
I am intending to accept your explanation.
However, I don't think all the C++ programmers will agree with you. As I have said, human lanaguges have intrinsic ambiguities. By the same words, people may mena different things. This is even true among those C++ gurus such as Bruce Eckel and Stanley Lippman.
For us, it is really diffiuclt to be judges because of our weakpoints in using English.
This post has been archived. It cannot be replied.