I guess you are talking about DBMS

lumlumq (lumlum)
your concept of atomic transaction is correct. But your atomic transaction is a solution to concurrency control, not to database recovery. The atomic transaction you referred to can guarantee that no two transactions
interleave each other, thus prevent "lost update" problem, but it doesn't help a failed system.
2001-4-12 -04:00
This post has been archived. It cannot be replied.
Page address has been copied. To share, click to copy page address.
Share Online by QR Code

Back To Topic: 请教大家一个技术问题, UNIX系统下, 如何写一个C程序, 能够在异常中断后程序重启时自动恢复文件读写指针(即接着上次中断的断点接着读写).

Back To Forum: HOME枫下论坛枫下论坛主坛工作学习IT技术讨论