whether or not it makes sense, and whether or not the "rationale" justifies the decision to totally abandon the Kyoto Protocol, those are different topics.

But trying to claim that PC does a better job using results beyond 2006 doesn't seem to be fair, after all, the Liberal lost the election in 2006, people would argue that, if they were able to stay in power, the Liberal would have beaten PC on this considering that they have committed to a very challenging target.

If I were PC, I wouldn't go in this direction, to me, it's a tough sell, it might do more harm than good. :)