This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下沙龙 / 谈天说地 / 网上写差评竟惹祸上身?加国夫妇被索赔300万
-0cean(海洋);
2017-10-30
(#11150314@0)
+1
-
这个消息很有趣。瞎想一下,网上肆意唱跌者会不会也被卖家告上法庭,赔偿低卖造成的损失?
-don-juan(谈·房);
2017-10-30
(#11150322@0)
+1
-
A key of writing review: Use description of facts; don't make emotional comments.
-sailor(Ocean & Mountain);
2017-10-31
(#11150380@0)
+1
-
刚好相反,你可以说他不好,说它烂,因为这些无法measure,也就无法判断正确还是错误, 如果摆事实可能被告毁谤,因为说出来的事实无法证明,结果可能被告毁谤
-northyork888(Northyork101);
2017-10-31
(#11150426@0)
+2
-
I am sorry, but you are completely wrong on this part.
-sailor(Ocean & Mountain);
2017-10-31
(#11150597@0)
+1
-
You are absolutely wrong and misleading, I can say the business is the worst because it is just judgemental comment,but if I say the restaurant provide dog meat and you can’t prove it,then will get in trouble for sure.understand the different?
-northyork888(Northyork101);
2017-10-31
(#11150627@0)
+4
-
OK, probably you're right. Just did a quick research, and found it's opposite to what I read before.
-sailor(Ocean & Mountain);
2017-10-31
(#11150804@0)
-
在网上发个不同意见就会被起诉那加拿大法律也太有娱乐精神了啊。
-breezy00(渺);
2017-10-31
(#11150713@0)
-
假消息,实际上是违背合同被索偿
-northyork888(Northyork101);
2017-10-31
(#11150425@0)
+2
-
同意。
-breezy00(渺);
2017-10-31
(#11150708@0)
-
cbc 也感染流行病?
-ly2010(晚豆角);
2017-10-31
(#11150812@0)
-
庭外和解,其使用的理由都是借口。实际上很可能就是因为差评。事实上,差评本身不会导致官司;在差评中添加了不实之词才可能是此事的根本。
-rollor(Rollor 印刷店);
2017-10-31
(#11151103@0)
+3
-
Can You Sue Over a Bad Review? Read this:
-sailor(Ocean & Mountain);
2017-10-31
(#11150815@0)