×

Loading...

一个好朋友给了我这篇文章 - Programmable Networking is SFW, from Juniper's CTO and chief architect. 这是我的想法,是否我在变老,太保守了?

本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛Similar thinking has been there from the beginning of Internet - where the intelligence should reside - on the network side, or on the server side... now they replaced "server" with "application"..

This is similar to the idea of enterprise message bus - to intelligently directing packets (rather than messages) to the right place dynamically based on time of the day, real time traffic situation, priority of the packets, etc etc...from a control brain outside of the network - meaning from different applications...comparing to today's easy solution - the network does not care, and does not have an end to end view, either geographically, or from the seven layers' perspective. Today's router and switches just forward the packets based on pre-defined forwarding table as fast as they can, with pre-defined QoS policies...

In my view, overly complicated technologies are hard to survive - as nobody can understand it and thus no one will use it. This programmable network is an interesting enough idea...just i can't see how it can be implemented in a large scale... maybe within a corporate network where security and end to end information are easier to obtain - otherwise, who will win the war to forward the packets faster than others based on what criteria ?

This is a good market strategy for Juniper to differentiate from Cisco's SONA... but at the end of the day, it may attract eye balls, but by no means it will become a reality any time soon..更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
Sign in and Reply Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 工作学习 / 科技领域杂谈 / 一个好朋友给了我这篇文章 - Programmable Networking is SFW, from Juniper's CTO and chief architect. 这是我的想法,是否我在变老,太保守了?
    本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛Similar thinking has been there from the beginning of Internet - where the intelligence should reside - on the network side, or on the server side... now they replaced "server" with "application"..

    This is similar to the idea of enterprise message bus - to intelligently directing packets (rather than messages) to the right place dynamically based on time of the day, real time traffic situation, priority of the packets, etc etc...from a control brain outside of the network - meaning from different applications...comparing to today's easy solution - the network does not care, and does not have an end to end view, either geographically, or from the seven layers' perspective. Today's router and switches just forward the packets based on pre-defined forwarding table as fast as they can, with pre-defined QoS policies...

    In my view, overly complicated technologies are hard to survive - as nobody can understand it and thus no one will use it. This programmable network is an interesting enough idea...just i can't see how it can be implemented in a large scale... maybe within a corporate network where security and end to end information are easier to obtain - otherwise, who will win the war to forward the packets faster than others based on what criteria ?

    This is a good market strategy for Juniper to differentiate from Cisco's SONA... but at the end of the day, it may attract eye balls, but by no means it will become a reality any time soon..更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
    • 看来Juniper不怎么样了,做市场做不过CISIO,做技术做不过F5, PALOALTO。上面这些东西用F5 早就是成熟的sulotion。
      • F5这些年做的不错,但目前好像还是主要在application delivery和security上,没有进入core routing and switching去和Cisco/Juniper (and mayeb even Huawei/HP) 硬碰硬。
    • getting serious? Cisco, Juniper among new software-defined networking research center's founders
      • 趁他们没搞出来前赶紧退休,这样是没完没了。