×

Loading...

Discover the most brutal leaders in history, three Chinese in top 6

1 - MAO, 2 - STALIN, 3 - HITLER, 4- KUBLAI KHAN, 5 - CIXI, 6 - CHIANG KAI-SHEK
Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下沙龙 / 谈天说地 / Discover the most brutal leaders in history, three Chinese in top 6
    • 不用看了,连蒋介石都能排这么高,说明这个排名纯粹是逗你玩。 +2
      • Do you know him? +1
        • I know you don't know I know you don't know him. Maybe someone should ask if the MSN editor knows him, otherwise how could he/her get this conclusion according to your logic.
          • #10975489@0
    • KUBLAI KHAN是忽必烈吗?
      • 是啊,成吉思汗是Genghis Khan。 +1
    • 慈禧算最残忍的啊比吕后还残忍?
      • I don't know, just saw this list and thought it is interesting.
        • 不了解慈禧啊只是觉着那么多华人上榜好像有些歧视华人啊。
          • Not sure, but it is from MSN and President Trump didn't seem to mention it is one of the fake news.
            • 川普太忙没看到。*_* 冒着被批评的危险说一句啊这个评选太笼统了啊至少我觉得希特勒该排第一啊犹太大屠杀就他干的啊。
            • I see. A news is a true story if Trump doesn't mention it as a fake one. Do you know Trump?
              • You didn't get it, did you?
                It was a joke.
      • 如果按统治时期非正常死亡人数算完全有可能。吕后时期整个中国才1千5百万人口,慈禧时期已经4个亿了啊。
    • 真的搞笑。中国近代就占了两个,杀了那么多人,怎么中国这几十年都是世界上人口第一大国?动动脑子吧 +4
      • 还是你动动脑子吧,他们杀了那么多人但没有阻止你的父母,你的父母的父母生育啊。难道你的意思是中国现在人多是因为他们没有杀的足够多? +2
        • 显然也没有阻止你的父母啊。'他们杀了那么多人?'哪吗多呢? +3
          • Sorry didn't know you are a friend of theirs. The number doesn't matter to you. +3
            • Theirs who? You known them? +2
              • Are you kidding? I thought you know them.
                The ones above.
      • 应该按比例算。
    • 慈禧也上板纯粹是搞笑,这个是谁脑洞大开排的。又是哪个恨自己当了中国人的。 +2
      • Do you know her?
        • 那说说为啥你信啊?
          • "Her government used great brutality to suppress mass uprisings of the people in several provinces."
            Is this true?
    • 跟一个。
      • 打不开啊。
        • 估计没人超过老毛。
          • 希特勒都没超过啊?
    • 有意思,其实组织排名的脑筋还是不够用,排名第六的正是因为要阻止排名第一的人类历史上无出其右的杀人魔头而上榜,第六那位应该得个什么诺贝尔和平奖之类的
      • 他如果不阻止,两个人就都上不了榜了。这个排名榜出于西方敌意是可以理解的,如果中国人也信就傻了。
        • Personally I don't want to believe it, but it is not about you believe it or not; it is about what it says is truth or not; ranking (number) doesn't really matter if what it says is truth
          BTW, the reason Jiang is on that list is not because of the civil war, it is because what he did when he ruled Taiwan after 1949.
          • you are absolutely right. 谁说的不重要,重要的事是它是不是事实。7千7百万这样的数据是怎么来的?你能够说清楚么?
            • 10 million or 100 million, does it change what they did? Ranking is not important, the important thing is what they did.
              • now you say fact(number) is not important. LOL.
                • Is number the fact only? What is the real and most important fact?