你这话不禁让人发笑!说得跟真的似的。你说这个事件里换了黑人,他们就会暴乱抗议?那你说他们会去找谁暴乱抗议?到那些个不良少年所属的种族社区去烧抢?(假设两个当事人搞清楚了他们是那个种族的)
(黑人)闹事是因为政府或执法单位的不公正,而不是因为黑人同西班牙人或华人或白人发生冲突(不管谁挑的衅)。 说实话,任何人骨子里多少都有种族、地域歧视,东方人、东欧人里就有很多,就连反种族歧视多少年的西方社会里的白人黑人也不例外。这个你我他是改变阻止不了的。 一开始仍鸡蛋似乎并不是因为路边的人是中国人才仍的巴?(你怎么能让不良少年保证在外寻事时一定得避开中国人?或者咱们中国人是不是都得弄的特殊些,头上都写上“别欺辱我”?) 最后冲突发展到紧追不舍,甚至肢体冲突,你怎么还能要求打架的对方骂人的内容,只能骂别的,不能提中国一词???不是幼稚可笑么!!其实到那时候,你也大可以对方的种族背景骂对方,没人能告你种族歧视——包括警察和政府。 所以在这个例子里,唯一可能告种族歧视的,只有办案的警察!勃朗峰,你给大伙说说看,你打算怎么告?我很有兴趣听!嘿嘿嘿。 又及:关于种族歧视的定义如下(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism#Racial_discrimination) Racial discrimination is treating people differently based on race. While this term usually refers to unfair treatment of minority racial groups in western societies, it can also refer to the opposite situation — which is described by some as reverse discrimination when it is due to affirmative action or other attempts to remedy past or current discrimination against minority racial groups. The term has been criticized on the basis that there is nothing "reverse" about discrimination, but discrimination is simply discrimination everywhere it's seen. -linjiaotou(林教头) 2007-3-3