本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛Economy Grew in Q1? Only If You Believe in Santa Claus
Posted May 01, 2008 10:55am EDT by Henry Blodget
From Silicon Alley Insider, May 1, 2008:
The recession-deniers were out in force yesterday after the "better-than-expected!" GDP figures came out: See? The economy GREW in Q1! We aren't in a recession! All that horrendous economic and housing data is just media hysteria!
Here's what they didn't tell you:
First, those are just preliminary numbers. Hold the champagne until the several rounds of revisions are out.
Second, 0.6% growth is horrible, especially when you consider that the population is growing at least 1%. On a per-capita basis, GDP was down.
Third, as the NY Post's John Crudele explains, the much ballyhooed "growth" was the product of three key inputs, none of which is a sign of consumer recovery (and one of which is absurd):
* Government spending (deficits),
* Inventory growth (companies buying stuff to put on shelves), and, most important,
* A 2.6% inflation assumption
Get that? To calculate that the economy grew 0.6%, the government had to assume that inflation was only 2.6%. Anyone out there who buys gas or food occasionally think that inflation is only 2.6%? Didn't think so.
Move that inflation assumption up to even 4%, says John Crudele, and GDP in Q1 was down. For the second quarter in a row. Which makes this an official recession. As if we didn't know that already.更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
Posted May 01, 2008 10:55am EDT by Henry Blodget
From Silicon Alley Insider, May 1, 2008:
The recession-deniers were out in force yesterday after the "better-than-expected!" GDP figures came out: See? The economy GREW in Q1! We aren't in a recession! All that horrendous economic and housing data is just media hysteria!
Here's what they didn't tell you:
First, those are just preliminary numbers. Hold the champagne until the several rounds of revisions are out.
Second, 0.6% growth is horrible, especially when you consider that the population is growing at least 1%. On a per-capita basis, GDP was down.
Third, as the NY Post's John Crudele explains, the much ballyhooed "growth" was the product of three key inputs, none of which is a sign of consumer recovery (and one of which is absurd):
* Government spending (deficits),
* Inventory growth (companies buying stuff to put on shelves), and, most important,
* A 2.6% inflation assumption
Get that? To calculate that the economy grew 0.6%, the government had to assume that inflation was only 2.6%. Anyone out there who buys gas or food occasionally think that inflation is only 2.6%? Didn't think so.
Move that inflation assumption up to even 4%, says John Crudele, and GDP in Q1 was down. For the second quarter in a row. Which makes this an official recession. As if we didn't know that already.更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net